home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: garlic.com!usenet
- From: kbull@garlic.com (Greg Thomson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.tech
- Subject: Re: Why Amiga sucks and why it does't
- Date: 21 Jan 1996 00:03:39 GMT
- Organization: South_Valley_Internet
- Message-ID: <796.6593T961T1490@garlic.com>
- References: <4dofod$lk@news.sdd.hp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: u.assign.garlic.com
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- >>1. Good multitasking
- >>2. Operating system does not waste resources like memory and processor
- >>3. A lot of free software
- >>4. Cool graphics programs ( which are now appearing on PC's)
-
- >I hate to tell you this, but it really sounds like you're in love with
- >another computer. Might be a good idea to sell off the 1200 before you
- >become an embittered old man.
-
-
- I have an A4000 with the Toaster at my school, so believe me I know how
- a real Amiga performs with a video card and all the other good
- stuff; good but expensive.
-
- You, by the way, remind me of myself one year ago. I would never
- admit that Amiga's were losing grond. Oh, and by the way if
- you play games like Mach Warior 2 you will hear the difference
- between Amiga sound and PC sound with a good soundcard.
-
- KBull
-
-
-
-
-